Monday, June 06, 2005
Why Media Ownership Matters
George Bush must have been delighted to learn from a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll that 56 percent of Americans still think Iraq had weapons of mass destruction before the start of the war, while six in 10 said they believe Iraq provided direct support to the al-Qaida terrorist network — notions that have long since been thoroughly debunked by everyone from the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee to both of Bush's handpicked weapons inspectors, Charles Duelfer and David Kay.
Americans believe these lies not because they are stupid, but because they are good media consumers. Our media have become an echo chamber for those in power. Rather than challenge the fraudulent claims of the Bush administration, we've had a media acting as a conveyor belt for the government's lies.
As the Pentagon has learned, deploying the American media is more powerful than any bomb. Full Link Could this be the reason for the consolidation of the media over the past two decades, a tool to control what Americans think? Take a look at the following article; what's wrong with this picture to determine if we have a reason or reasons to be concerned about who or how many corporations own the media. In other words, does Media Ownership really matter? A quote from the article "While the players tend to come and go--always with a few exceptions--the overall Leviathan itself keeps getting bigger, louder, brighter, forever taking up more time and space, in every street, in countless homes, in every other head."
posted by Cynthia
Permalink|
(1)|
Post a Comment
---------------oOo---------------
